EPIC BATTLETECH v1.1 RULES
--------------------------
Written by Rimoran (Mike)
Revised with contributions from BT CCG Listers:
champion_of_solaris, sillywiz, gomes_diogo, and
theoriginalcabhammer
--------------------------

1) Banned - Cards with "Alliance" keyword and
   Effective Groundwork.

2) Deck Construction - Only 2 of any single card name
   unless it is a basic zero-cost "Support" resource
   card, if so, it is unlimited.  This limitation
   extends to any side-boarding.

3) Resource / Offensive Mission Link -
   You may only declare 1 Offensive Mission for
   every 2 resource cards you have in play (round up).
   An Offensive Mission is any mission involving a unit
   or units that target your opponent in any way. 
   Guarding missions are unaffected and unlimited.

4) Box Powers - Only if all players have them.

5) Clarification - Vehicles & Battle Armor continue to
   be limited to 10 total (w/ no more than 2 of each
   card name as in rule #2)

6) Clarification - All existing official errata is
   naturally still in force.
--------------------------

OVERALL RATIONALE:

I would say there are really 2 types of play card games:
1) "Power Gamers" - Those whose main objective is to win.
   Winning is what defines an enjoyable experience.
2) "Story Tellers" - Those whose main objective is to
   see what interesting kind of experience can be created
   through the events that unfold during the game.

"Power Gamers" will probably find the following rules
variant to be annoying.  "Story Tellers" might find it
a refreshing change that levels the playing field.

Even with DCI rulings, banning and errata, I see the 
BT: CCG as a "Power Gamer" game.  It's all about 
focusing your decks along a narrow band of 
possibilities and maximizing that potential - hence
you have the FD decks and Swarm decks reigning supreme.


INDIVIDUAL RULES RATIONALE:

Banned Cards - 

  I just feel the above cards can just be abused too
  much and violate game balance.  Other cards banned
  in the past are unbanned.  And the dangers posed
  by the formerly banned cards are reduced by the 
  other deck construction parameters (ie. 2 of each 
  card name max).


Deck Construction -

  The higher the limit on the number of the same cards
  in your deck the more focused it will become at pulling
  off whatever singular "engine of doom" that a power
  gamer has devised.  A 2 card limit enforces a diversity
  that lets everyone actually play with cards that you
  might not have seen played in a more cut-throat 
  environment.

  In theory, an average player will draw 1/2 his deck and
  take the other 1/2 of it in damage.  Thus, you will 
  probably only get an average of 1 of the 2 cards of any
  one name out into play which greatly reduces the "danger"
  of the formerly banned cards which work best en-masse.


Resource / Offensive Mission Link -

  You could either look at the Battletech CCG as operating
  on one of two different scales:  "Single Planet" or 
  "Interstellar."  I think the designers have assumed the
  game to operate on a kind of hybrid between the two with
  a leaning toward the "Single Planet" approach.  The
  "Single Planet" approach works well for the simulated 
  Unit to Unit combat that currently exists.  But if
  you go the single planet route, then having 2 major
  leaders of successor states (or clans) on the same world
  (ie. Hanse Davion & Thomas Marik) becomes a little far- 
  fetched.  The Epic rules variant takes a more
  "Interstellar" approach to the game and assumes that
  the majority of concepts in play are actually spread out
  among many different worlds and the reason that offensive
  missions are limited are due to the limited number of
  dropships and jumpships available to convey these missions
  to their destinations.  

  The OTHER main reason for this rule would be to curtail
  the "swarm of small mechs reign supreme" effect that seems
  to rule the game.  Since the default rules allow for an
  unlimited number of missions if you have more mechs than
  your opponent you can always lead with your smaller units
  to harass your opponent into submission because that
  opponent must keep units available to stop the nastier
  elements of your forces.  A limit to missions changes the
  plethora "Single Unit Missions" that I constantly see and 
  encourages missions with several units which I feel is
  more interesting to play out anyway.